accused Diddy of running a sexual blackmail operation akin to Jeffrey Epstein’s activities in the rap and music industry for around 30 years.

She alleges that Diddy’s head of security during this operation was Fahim Muhammad, who previously worked for Michael Jackson and was one of the first individuals on the scene when Jackson died.

This connection raises questions about potential links between Diddy’s activities and broader events in the entertainment industry.

Furthermore, Owens suggests that record executives at the highest levels were aware of Diddy’s actions and even participated in the activities, including attending parties with underage girls where drinks were spiked. This implies a level of complicity and support from within the industry for Diddy’s alleged behavior.

The lawsuit against Diddy, as described by Owens and independent journalist Ian Carroll, presents significant evidence supporting claims of a sexual blackmail ring operated by Diddy, implicating not only Diddy himself but also individuals at the top of the music industry hierarchy. These allegations shed light on the darker side of the entertainment industry and raise concerns about the exploitation of vulnerable individuals for personal gain.

quite a lot of information to process. Owens claims that Fahim Muhammad, who allegedly covered up a shooting involving Diddy’s son, was also present when Michael Jackson died. She connects this to allegations that Jackson kept a list of industry figures he considered enemies, some of whom were Jewish. This leads to speculation about whether Diddy was on Jackson’s list and potentially involved in his death.

Moreover, Owens suggests that Diddy’s involvement in criminal activities, including running a sexual blackmail operation, may have led to his cooperation with the FBI as an informant. This collaboration supposedly allowed Diddy to gather evidence against powerful individuals in exchange for protection from his own crimes. These allegations draw parallels between Diddy and Jeffrey Epstein, including accusations of child trafficking and the use of compromising material for leverage.

Furthermore, there are implications that Diddy’s influence extends to the manipulation of surveillance footage to conceal his abusive behavior towards Cassie. It’s suggested that he paid the hotel where the incident occurred to suppress the footage, but it eventually surfaced, possibly due to government involvement in a raid on Diddy’s properties.

The intertwining of criminal allegations, surveillance manipulation, and potential government involvement paints a complex and disturbing picture of power dynamics within the entertainment industry.